Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

European Radiology 2018 June 20
OBJECTIVES: To use Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorization and features of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) to intraindividually compare gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-DTPA-MRI) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI), before and after applying modified major features.

METHODS: Of 77 HCCs in 64 patients analysed, 17 HCCs were confirmed histopathologically and 46 patients had cirrhosis. Gd-EOB-MRI and Gd-DTPA-MRI were evaluated for the presence of major and ancillary features by two radiologists. LI-RADS categorization was done for Gd-DTPA-MRI (LI-RADS-DTPA) and for Gd-EOB-MRI before and after applying modified major features (hepatobiliary phase [HBP] hypointensity as an additional major feature, LI-RADS-EOBm1; HBP hypointense rim as capsule appearance, LI-RADS-EOBm2; and transitional phase [TP] hypointensity as washout appearance, LI-RADS-EOBm3). Sensitivities of LR-5 categorization for the diagnosis of HCC were compared.

RESULTS: Washout (p=0.012) and capsule appearance (p<0.001) were less frequently observed on Gd-EOB-MRI. Sensitivity for LR-5 categorization was significantly higher with LI-RADS-DTPA compared with LI-RADS-EOB (p=0.001) and LI-RADS-EOBm2 (p=0.004), while sensitivity for LR-5 categorization with LI-RADS-EOBm1 (p=0.210) and LI-RADS-EOBm3 (p=0.727) was comparable.

CONCLUSION: Modifying LI-RADS for use with Gd-EOB-MRI, such as applying HBP hypointensity as an additional major feature or using TP hypointensity as washout appearance, can improve the sensitivity for the detection of HCC.

KEY POINTS: • Adding HBP hypointensity as additional major feature improved sensitivity of LR-5 categorization. • Adding TP hypointensity as modified washout appearance improved sensitivity of LR-5 categorization. • Sensitivities for LR-5 classification were comparable between LI-RADS-DTPA, LI-RADS-EOBm1, and LI-RADS-EOBm3.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app