Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Utilization of fine needle aspiration cytology at Kamuzu central hospital.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been widely accepted to be a safe, accurate, prompt and inexpensive procedure for diagnosis of both neoplastic and infectious diseases in adult and pediatric populations. Despite its value for diagnosis, FNAC is underutilized in resource limited countries. We reviewed the utilization of FNAC after it was introduced at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH).

METHODS: A retrospective review of all FNAC performed at KCH laboratory during the period of January 2012 to July 2014 was conducted using an electronic database from KCH laboratory. We evaluated factors associated with a diagnostic sample using multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS: 750 FNAC were reviewed from 722 patients: 56.9% were adults >15 years and 54% were female. The number of FNAC increased annually from 56 (2012) to 379 (2013) to 315 (up to July 2014). Of 750 FNAC, 56.4% were performed by non-pathologists. The most common sites were lymph nodes (38.1%), abdomen (25.8%), breast (16.3%), and head & neck (15.7%). Most of the samples (77.6%) were diagnostic. FNAC was more likely to be diagnostic if performed by pathologists versus non-pathologists (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.20-2.64), in 2013 compared to 2012 (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.05-3.56), or performed on a deep lesion versus a subcutaneous lesion (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.5), or if samples were taken from the head and neck (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.39-4.39), and abdomen (OR 2.66, 95%CI1.59-4.42) compared to those from the lymph nodes. The odds of a diagnostic test did not differ significantly according to gender, HIV status, or age groups.

CONCLUSION: Most FNACs successfully diagnosed the presence or absence of disease, with substantial improvements over time. However, training for non-pathologists may facilitate more diagnostic results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app