We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
A comparison of the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias between thoracic paravertebral and intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: A randomised trial.
European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2018 October
BACKGROUND: Postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias are common in patients after thoracoscopic lobectomy. Inadequate pain control has long been recognised as a significant risk factor for arrhythmias. The performance of ultrasound-guided (USG) thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) is increasing as an ideal technique for postoperative analgesia.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to evaluate whether a single-shot USG thoracic PVB would result in fewer postoperative supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) than intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled study.
SETTING: A single university hospital.
PATIENTS: Sixty-eight patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomised into two equal groups of 34.
INTERVENTIONS: For postoperative pain control, all patients received a total of 0.3 ml kg of a mixture containing 0.5% ropivacaine and 1/200 000 epinephrine after placement of needles for either a single thoracic PVB or two individual ICNBs, both guided by ultrasound. Data were obtained during the first 48 postoperative hours.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of SVT after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
RESULTS: During the first 48 postoperative hours, the incidences of SVT and atrial fibrillation were lower in the USG thoracic PVB group (14.7 vs. 46.9%, P = 0.004 and 3.0 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.037, respectively). The requirement for β-receptor blockade was more frequent in the ICNBs group than in the PVB group (5.9 vs. 25%, P = 0.033).
CONCLUSION: After placement of the needle using ultrasound guidance, a single-shot thoracic PVB is a well tolerated and effective technique to reduce the incidences of postoperative SVT and atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org/cn/, registration number: ChiCTR-IOR-17010952.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to evaluate whether a single-shot USG thoracic PVB would result in fewer postoperative supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) than intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled study.
SETTING: A single university hospital.
PATIENTS: Sixty-eight patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomised into two equal groups of 34.
INTERVENTIONS: For postoperative pain control, all patients received a total of 0.3 ml kg of a mixture containing 0.5% ropivacaine and 1/200 000 epinephrine after placement of needles for either a single thoracic PVB or two individual ICNBs, both guided by ultrasound. Data were obtained during the first 48 postoperative hours.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of SVT after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
RESULTS: During the first 48 postoperative hours, the incidences of SVT and atrial fibrillation were lower in the USG thoracic PVB group (14.7 vs. 46.9%, P = 0.004 and 3.0 vs. 18.8%, P = 0.037, respectively). The requirement for β-receptor blockade was more frequent in the ICNBs group than in the PVB group (5.9 vs. 25%, P = 0.033).
CONCLUSION: After placement of the needle using ultrasound guidance, a single-shot thoracic PVB is a well tolerated and effective technique to reduce the incidences of postoperative SVT and atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org/cn/, registration number: ChiCTR-IOR-17010952.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app