Comparison of three commercially available buffy coat pooling sets for the preparation of platelet concentrates.

BACKGROUND: A disposable set for platelet concentrate (PC) preparation by the buffy coat method allows pooling of buffy coats, centrifugation and cell separation with in-line leucocyte filtration. This study compares three commercially available pooling sets in combination with INTERCEPT pathogen inactivation (PI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sets for pooling of buffy coats were from Fresenius Kabi (FRE), Macopharma (MAC) and Terumo BCT (TER). Platelet yield, recovery and concentration were compared before and after PI (n = 20). Platelet quality was assessed by annexin V binding, P-selectin expression and PAC1 binding.

RESULTS: The TER pooling set had the highest platelet yield (5·39 ± 0·44 × 1011 ) compared with MAC (4·53 ± 0·77) and FRE (4·56 ± 0·51) prior to PI. This was the result of a significantly higher platelet concentration in the TER storage bag (1·41 ± 0·12 × 106 /μL) compared with MAC (1·18 ± 0·19) and FRE (1·28 ± 0·15). However, the TER platelet content decreased by 15·6% after PI, yielding 4·55 ± 0·47 × 1011 platelets compared with smaller reductions at 9·5% for MAC (4·10 ± 0·69) and 4·4% for FRE (4·36 ± 0·52). None of the individual PC contained >106 leucocytes. The pH in TER PC was lower compared with MAC and FRE caused by a higher lactic acid production rate. Consequently, PAC1 binding after TRAP activation was lowest for TER PC on day 6. P-selectin and annexin V were not different between suppliers.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the added value of evaluating the entire component production process when introducing a new consumable. This study helped to inform a decision on what pooling set is ideally suited for routine implementation taking into account PI.