We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Analysis of dual energy spectral CT and pathological grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
PloS One 2018
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the dual energy spectral computer tomography (CT) imaging features of the pathological grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and the correlation between spectral CT imaging features and pathology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed analyses of 62 patients with confirmed diagnosis of ccRCC. All patients underwent non-enhanced CT and dual-phase (cortex phase, CP and parenchyma phase, PP) contrast-enhanced CT with dual energy spectral mode. The subjects were pathologically divided into two groups: low-grade group (Fuhrman 1/2) and high-grade group (Fuhrman 3/4). The CT value of each lesion was measured on the monochromatic image at 70 keV. The normalized iodine concentrations (NIC) and the slope of the spectrum curve were calculated. The qualitative morphological parameters, including tumor shape, calcification, pseudocapsule, necrosis, and enhancement mode, were compared between the two groups. The quantitative data were compared using Student's t-test, and the enumeration data were analyzed using the chi-square test between low-grade and high-grade ccRCC.Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative parameters in two groups.
RESULTS: The CT value, NIC, and mean slope of the low-grade group were increased compared with the high-grade group during CP (P = 0.001, P = 0.043, and P<0.001, respectively). The CT did not differ significantly during PP (P = 0.134); however, the NIC and mean slope varied considerably in the low grade compared with the high-grade group (P = 0.048, P = 0.017, respectively). The CT threshold value, NIC, and slope had high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating low-grade ccRCC from high-grade ccRCC. The tumor shape, pseudocapsule, and necrosis differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Dual energy spectral CT with the quantitative analysis of iodine concentration and qualitative analysis of morphological characteristics increases the accuracy of diagnosing the pathological grade of ccRCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed analyses of 62 patients with confirmed diagnosis of ccRCC. All patients underwent non-enhanced CT and dual-phase (cortex phase, CP and parenchyma phase, PP) contrast-enhanced CT with dual energy spectral mode. The subjects were pathologically divided into two groups: low-grade group (Fuhrman 1/2) and high-grade group (Fuhrman 3/4). The CT value of each lesion was measured on the monochromatic image at 70 keV. The normalized iodine concentrations (NIC) and the slope of the spectrum curve were calculated. The qualitative morphological parameters, including tumor shape, calcification, pseudocapsule, necrosis, and enhancement mode, were compared between the two groups. The quantitative data were compared using Student's t-test, and the enumeration data were analyzed using the chi-square test between low-grade and high-grade ccRCC.Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative parameters in two groups.
RESULTS: The CT value, NIC, and mean slope of the low-grade group were increased compared with the high-grade group during CP (P = 0.001, P = 0.043, and P<0.001, respectively). The CT did not differ significantly during PP (P = 0.134); however, the NIC and mean slope varied considerably in the low grade compared with the high-grade group (P = 0.048, P = 0.017, respectively). The CT threshold value, NIC, and slope had high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating low-grade ccRCC from high-grade ccRCC. The tumor shape, pseudocapsule, and necrosis differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Dual energy spectral CT with the quantitative analysis of iodine concentration and qualitative analysis of morphological characteristics increases the accuracy of diagnosing the pathological grade of ccRCC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app