Biomarkers of preconception stress and the incidence of pregnancy loss.

STUDY QUESTION: Are biomarkers of preconception stress associated with pregnancy loss?

SUMMARY ANSWER: Preconception stress, as measured by basal salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase concentrations, is not associated with pregnancy loss.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Many studies, most of which have been retrospective, have identified an association between stressful life events and perceived stress and miscarriage.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective pregnancy study with preconception enrollment was conducted between 2005 and 2009. Among the 344 women who became pregnant during the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) study, 337 (98%) had salivary biomarker data for analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Couples planning pregnancy were followed for up to 12 months as they tried to become pregnant and through pregnancy if it occurred. Participating women collected a basal saliva sample on the morning following enrollment and a second on the morning following their next menses to measure cortisol and alpha-amylase, biomarkers of stress. Women used home pregnancy tests on the day of expected menses. A pregnancy loss was defined as a negative pregnancy test following a positive pregnancy test, the onset of menses, or for pregnancies that survived to clinical recognition, recognition of the loss by a healthcare provider.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the 337 couples, the median age of female and male partners was 29 and 31 years, respectively. Most of the women were non-Hispanic white (83%) and highly educated. There were 97 pregnancy losses reported among the 337 pregnancies. The median gestational age at loss was 6 weeks 5 days with only two losses occurring in the second trimester. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we found no clear pattern of association between two preconceptional biomarkers of stress (salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase concentrations) modeled both continuously or in tertiles and incident pregnancy loss after adjustment for confounders.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our prior work suggests that women enrolled in the LIFE Study had lower stress levels than women in the general population. Owing to concerns regarding participant burden, we were unable to collect serial saliva measurements, which would have allowed us to examine the association between stress in early pregnancy and pregnancy loss. Further, with regard to the measurement of perceived stress, the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale was only administered at baseline. While every attempt was made to ensure diversity in the cohort, non-Hispanic white women were over-represented, therefore it is possible that the results might not be generalizable to all women.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In one of the largest studies in the USA to prospectively capture data on the incidence of early pregnancy loss, we found no clear association between two biomarkers of preconception stress (measured in saliva) and pregnancy loss.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (contracts #N01-HD-3-3355, N01-HD-3-3356, N01-HD-3358). There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.