We have located links that may give you full text access.
Occult RV systolic dysfunction detected by CMR derived RV circumferential strain in patients with pectus excavatum.
PloS One 2017
AIMS: To investigate the right ventricular (RV) strain in pectus excavatum (PE) patients using cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking (CMR TT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive pectus excavatum patients, 10 to 32 years of age (mean age 15 ± 4 years), underwent routine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) including standard measures of chest geometry and cardiac size and function. The control group consisted of 20 healthy patients with a mean age of 17 ± 5 years. RV longitudinal and circumferential strain magnitude was assessed by a dedicated RV tissue tracking software.
RESULTS: Fifty patients with images of sufficient quality were included in the analysis. The mean right and left ventricular ejection fractions were 55 ± 5% and 59 ± 4%. The RV global longitudinal strain was -21.88 ± 4.63%. The RV circumferential strain at base, mid-cavity and apex were -13.66 ± 3.09%, -11.31 ± 2.79%, -20.73 ± 3.45%, respectively. There was no statistically significant decrease in right ventricular or left ventricular ejection fraction between patients and controls (p > 0.05 for each). There was no significant difference in RV global longitudinal strain between two groups (-21.88 ± 4.63 versus -21.99 ± 3.58; p = 0.93). However, there was significant decrease in mid-cavity circumferential strain magnitude in pectus patients compared with controls (-11.31 ± 2.79 versus -16.19 ± 2.86; p < 0.001). PE patients had a significantly higher basal circumferential strain (-13.66 ± 3.09% versus -9.76 ± 1.79; p < 0.001) as well as apical circumferential strain (-20.73 ± 3.45% versus -12.07 ± 3.38) than control group.
CONCLUSION: Mid-cavity circumferential strain but not longitudinal strain is reduced in pectus excavatum patients. Basal circumferential strain as well as apical circumferential strain were increased as compensatory mechanism for reduced mid-cavity circumferential strain. Further studies are needed to establish clinical significance of this finding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive pectus excavatum patients, 10 to 32 years of age (mean age 15 ± 4 years), underwent routine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) including standard measures of chest geometry and cardiac size and function. The control group consisted of 20 healthy patients with a mean age of 17 ± 5 years. RV longitudinal and circumferential strain magnitude was assessed by a dedicated RV tissue tracking software.
RESULTS: Fifty patients with images of sufficient quality were included in the analysis. The mean right and left ventricular ejection fractions were 55 ± 5% and 59 ± 4%. The RV global longitudinal strain was -21.88 ± 4.63%. The RV circumferential strain at base, mid-cavity and apex were -13.66 ± 3.09%, -11.31 ± 2.79%, -20.73 ± 3.45%, respectively. There was no statistically significant decrease in right ventricular or left ventricular ejection fraction between patients and controls (p > 0.05 for each). There was no significant difference in RV global longitudinal strain between two groups (-21.88 ± 4.63 versus -21.99 ± 3.58; p = 0.93). However, there was significant decrease in mid-cavity circumferential strain magnitude in pectus patients compared with controls (-11.31 ± 2.79 versus -16.19 ± 2.86; p < 0.001). PE patients had a significantly higher basal circumferential strain (-13.66 ± 3.09% versus -9.76 ± 1.79; p < 0.001) as well as apical circumferential strain (-20.73 ± 3.45% versus -12.07 ± 3.38) than control group.
CONCLUSION: Mid-cavity circumferential strain but not longitudinal strain is reduced in pectus excavatum patients. Basal circumferential strain as well as apical circumferential strain were increased as compensatory mechanism for reduced mid-cavity circumferential strain. Further studies are needed to establish clinical significance of this finding.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app