Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Molecular Characterization and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Sequentially Obtained Clinical Cryptococcus deneoformans and Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates from Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Mycopathologia 2018 April
AIM: To retrospectively investigate the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

METHODOLOGY: Forty-six sequentially obtained isolates from 19 patients were subjected to amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genotyping, microsatellite typing, mating- and serotype PCRs and antifungal susceptibility testing.

RESULTS: Majority of the isolates were Cryptococcus deneoformans (n = 29/46; 63%) followed by Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 16/46; 34.8%) and their interspecies hybrid (n = 1/46; 2.2%). Mating-type α was predominant, two mating-type a C. deneoformans isolates and one mating-type a/α isolate were observed. Several mixed infections were found by microsatellite typing; one patient had a persisting C. deneoformans infection for > 2.5 years. For C. deneoformans, the in vitro antifungal MIC90 and susceptibility ranges were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.031-0.25 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 0.25 µg/ml (0.063-4 µg/ml), fluconazole 8 µg/ml (0.5-16 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.125 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031-0.125 µg/ml). For C. neoformans, these values were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.063-0.5 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 1 µg/ml (0.063-1 µg/ml), fluconazole 16 µg/ml (0.5-64 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.125 µg/ml (0.008-0.25 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031-0.125 µg/ml).

CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were caused by C. deneoformans; mating-type α was predominant. Several mixed infections were identified by AFLP genotyping and microsatellite typing. Despite antifungal therapy, a cryptococcal isolate could persist for years. Voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole were the most potent antifungal drugs.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app