Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Differential Myocardial Fibre Involvement by Strain Analysis in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease and can result in left ventricular (LV) systolic impairment. LV myocardial fibres are organised in layers: the subendocardial layer is orientated longitudinally and the subepicardial layer circumferentially. We hypothesised that there is differential involvement of myocardial fibres in patients with aortic stenosis.

METHODS: We performed multi-directional, multi-layered systolic strain analysis in 70 patients (aged 72±10.7years) with varying grades of AS severity (mean gradient 32.3±20mmHg, aortic valve area 1.1±0.6cm2 ) and in 30 controls. Clinical, demographic and resting echocardiographic data were recorded. Left ventricular subendocardial and subepicardial systolic strains were measured in the longitudinal, radial and circumferential axes.

RESULTS: Systolic subendocardial strain was significantly higher than subepicardial strain in all three axes in patients and in controls. There were significant differences in longitudinal, but not in circumferential and radial strain, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), between patient groups. Aortic valve mean gradient (MG) and valve area (AVA) correlated better with subendocardial longitudinal strain (r=0.548, p<0.001; r=-0.54, p<0.001 respectively) than with subepicardial longitudinal strain (r=0.496, p<0.001, r=-0.544, p<0.001 respectively). Correlations between circumferential and radial strain and MG or AVA were poor.

CONCLUSIONS: There was differential impairment in LV systolic strain in all three cardiac axes in patients with AS. Left ventricular longitudinal strain impairment was proportional to AS severity. Subendocardial longitudinal strain correlated better with AS severity than subepicardial longitudinal strain while correlations between circumferential and radial strain and AS severity were weak.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app