We have located links that may give you full text access.
Preemptive Ladd Procedure in congenital diaphragmatic hernia and Abdominal Wall defects does not reduce the risk of future volvulus.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2017 December
INTRODUCTION: Patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), gastroschisis, and omphalocele are prone to abnormalities of intestinal rotation and thus future midgut volvulus. Controversy exists whether routine preemptive Ladd procedure in this subgroup of asymptomatic patients is of value to reduce future volvulus.
METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was queried for neonates with CDH, gastroschisis, and omphalocele between January 2009 and September 2015. Standard univariate and multivariate analysis was completed to compare risk of volvulus between patients treated with a preemptive Ladd versus no Ladd (p<0.05).
RESULTS: Seven thousand seven hundred forty-nine neonates with CDH (40%), gastroschisis (38%), omphalocele (14%), and abdominal wall malformation (NOS) (9%) were identified. Overall, 3.6% (n=279) had a preemptive. Thirty-two patients had subsequent volvulus. Ladd procedure did not reduce volvulus readmissions for any diagnosis and was associated with a significantly increased risk of volvulus for omphalocele patients (9.1% vs 0.1%, p<0.001). Overall, a Ladd procedure during the index admission was associated with a higher risk for volvulus (1.4% vs. 0.4%, p=0.021) and was associated with a 3.28 increased odds ratio of future volvulus (95% CI 1.12-9.68).
CONCLUSION: Ladd procedure performed prophylactically in patients with CDH, gastroschisis, and omphalocele did not reduce subsequent volvulus.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was queried for neonates with CDH, gastroschisis, and omphalocele between January 2009 and September 2015. Standard univariate and multivariate analysis was completed to compare risk of volvulus between patients treated with a preemptive Ladd versus no Ladd (p<0.05).
RESULTS: Seven thousand seven hundred forty-nine neonates with CDH (40%), gastroschisis (38%), omphalocele (14%), and abdominal wall malformation (NOS) (9%) were identified. Overall, 3.6% (n=279) had a preemptive. Thirty-two patients had subsequent volvulus. Ladd procedure did not reduce volvulus readmissions for any diagnosis and was associated with a significantly increased risk of volvulus for omphalocele patients (9.1% vs 0.1%, p<0.001). Overall, a Ladd procedure during the index admission was associated with a higher risk for volvulus (1.4% vs. 0.4%, p=0.021) and was associated with a 3.28 increased odds ratio of future volvulus (95% CI 1.12-9.68).
CONCLUSION: Ladd procedure performed prophylactically in patients with CDH, gastroschisis, and omphalocele did not reduce subsequent volvulus.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app