Expanding the Scope of Quality Measurement in Surgery to Include Non-Operative Care: Results from the ACS NSQIP Emergency General Surgery Pilot.

BACKGROUND: Patients managed non-operatively have been excluded from risk-adjusted benchmarking programs, including the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Consequently, optimal performance evaluation is not possible for specialties like emergency general surgery (EGS) where non-operative management is common. We developed a multi-institutional EGS clinical data registry within ACS NSQIP that includes patients managed non-operatively to evaluate variability in non-operative care across hospitals and identify gaps in performance assessment that occur when only operative cases are considered.

METHODS: Using ACS NSQIP infrastructure and methodology, surgical consultations for acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, and small bowel obstruction (SBO) were sampled at 13 hospitals that volunteered to participate in the EGS clinical data registry. Standard NSQIP variables and 16 EGS-specific variables were abstracted with 30-day follow-up. To determine the influence of complications in non-operative patients, rates of adverse outcomes were identified and hospitals were ranked by performance with and then without including non-operative cases.

RESULTS: 2,091 patients with EGS diagnoses were included, 46.6% with appendicitis, 24.3% with cholecystitis, and 29.1% with SBO. The overall rate of non-operative management was 27.4%, 6.6% for appendicitis, 16.5% for cholecystitis, and 69.9% for SBO. Despite comprising only 27.4% of patients in the EGS Pilot, non-operative management accounted for 67.7% of deaths, 34.3% of serious morbidities, and 41.8% of hospital readmissions. After adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital diagnosis mix, addition of non-operative management to hospital performance assessment resulted in 12 of 13 hospitals changing performance rank, with 4 hospitals changing by 3 or more positions.

CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a gap in performance evaluation when non-operative patients are excluded from surgical quality assessment and demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating non-operative care into existing surgical quality initiatives. Broadening the scope of hospital performance assessment to include non-operative management creates an opportunity to improve the care of all surgical patients, not just those who have an operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Prognostic and Epidemiological.