Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Umbilical necrosis rates after abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical stalk necrosis represents a rare, yet important complication after abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction, which is both underrecognized and understudied in the literature. Once identified, umbilical reconstruction can be an extremely challenging problem.

METHODS: All consecutive breast free flaps at a single institution from February 2004 to February 2016 were reviewed, excluding non-abdominal-based flaps. Patients were divided based on the development of umbilical necrosis postoperatively. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and other complications were compared between the groups.

RESULTS: A total of 918 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 29 developing umbilical necrosis identified (3.2%). Patients developing necrosis tended to be older (49.4 yrs versus 52.9 yrs; P < 0.01); have higher BMI (31.3 versus 27.8; P < 0.01); and were more likely to be smokers (27.5% versus 11.6%; P = 0.01). Umbilical necrosis was also associated with increased flap weight (830 g versus 656 g; P < 0.01), decreased time of perforator dissection (151 min versus 169 min; P = 0.02); bilateral cases (68.9% versus 44.7%; P < 0.01), and increased number of perforators per flap (2.5 versus 2.2; P = 0.03). There was no association with flap type (deep inferior epigastric perforator, superficial inferior epigastric artery, or free TRAM), diabetes, previous abdominal surgery, or use of preoperative imaging. Umbilical necrosis was not associated with any concomitant complications.

CONCLUSIONS: Umbilical stalk necrosis was found to occur in 3.2% of patients and was associated with several preoperative comorbidities and intraoperative characteristics. This information should help influence intraoperative decision-making to prevent the development of this undesirable complication.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app