Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

C-reactive Protein (CRP) as a Single Biomarker for Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.

Neonatal sepsis (NS) is a life-threatening disorder and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates. Blood culture, the gold standard for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is costly, not available at all centres and test result not readily available. CRP is low cost diagnostic test for neonatal sepsis which is possible to perform at all centres and test result is easily available. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to identify neonatal sepsis. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the CRP in neonatal sepsis. The literature was searched in PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Google scholar and other Medical Databases using set search criteria. Each included study was evaluated by quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. Four investigators independently extracted the data and study characteristics, and disagreements, if any, were resolved by consensus. Meta-disc software was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary diagnostic odds ratio (SDOR), I² or Cochrane Q to test heterogeneity. False positive report probability (FPRP) was calculated to confirm the significance of the results. Eleven studies (1557 neonates) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 71% and 86% respectively, which had moderate accuracy in the diagnosis of NS. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under curve (AUC) was 19.10 and 0.8535 (Q*=0.7845), respectively. The diagnostic threshold analysis showed that there was no threshold effect. Meta-analysis showed that CRP had a moderate accuracy (AUC=0.8535) for the diagnosis of NS. CRP is a helpful biomarker for diagnosis of NS. However, we should combine the results with clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory and microbial results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app