We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
CT-determined pulmonary artery to aorta ratio as a predictor of elevated pulmonary artery pressure and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) is a significant prognostic indicator in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It has been reported that the computed tomography-determined ratio of the diameter of the pulmonary artery to the aorta (PA:A) is correlated with mPAP in various respiratory diseases. However, in patients with IPF, whether the PA:A can be used to predict elevated mPAP and the prognostic value of the PA:A has not been fully evaluated.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, observational study of 177 consecutive IPF patients who underwent right heart catheterization. We examined the association between the PA:A and mPAP in these patients, and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to test the diagnostic accuracy of the PA:A in predicting mPAP > 20 mm Hg (pulmonary hypertension (PH) or borderline PH) in relation to survival.
RESULTS: In a multivariate linear regression analysis, the PA:A, 6-min walk distance and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO ) % predicted were independent explanatory variables of elevated mPAP (P < 0.0001, P = 0.009 and P = 0.002, respectively). ROC analysis revealed a PA:A > 0.9 to be optimal for predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.84). Patients with a PA:A > 0.9 also had a worse prognosis (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: Measurement of the PA:A is a useful and convenient method to predict elevated mPAP in IPF at initial evaluation. Moreover, a PA:A >0.9 was found to be an indicator of worse prognosis.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, observational study of 177 consecutive IPF patients who underwent right heart catheterization. We examined the association between the PA:A and mPAP in these patients, and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to test the diagnostic accuracy of the PA:A in predicting mPAP > 20 mm Hg (pulmonary hypertension (PH) or borderline PH) in relation to survival.
RESULTS: In a multivariate linear regression analysis, the PA:A, 6-min walk distance and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO ) % predicted were independent explanatory variables of elevated mPAP (P < 0.0001, P = 0.009 and P = 0.002, respectively). ROC analysis revealed a PA:A > 0.9 to be optimal for predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.84). Patients with a PA:A > 0.9 also had a worse prognosis (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: Measurement of the PA:A is a useful and convenient method to predict elevated mPAP in IPF at initial evaluation. Moreover, a PA:A >0.9 was found to be an indicator of worse prognosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app