Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Four Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Pediatric Dentistry 2017 March 16
PURPOSE: To compare the volume of root canals of primary teeth filled by four different obturating techniques: (1) lentulospiral (LS); (2) insulin syringe (IS); (3) endodontic pressure syringe (EPS); and (4) the NaviTip system (NS) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS: 76 root canals of primary posterior teeth were selected and divided into four groups, according to the obturation technique. Biomechanical preparation of each root canal was completed with a number 30 K-file, and the volumes of the canals were then measured using CBCT. Each canal was obturated with zinc oxide eugenol paste using the respective technique for that group. A second CBCT scan was performed to measure the filled volume in each canal, and the percentage of obturated volume (POV) was calculated.

RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was seen between the pre- and post-mean values (P<.001) and in the mean POV values (P< .001) among the four groups. NS (93.5 percent) and EPS (91.5 percent) showed the highest POV compared to LS (75.5 percent) and IS (64 percent).

CONCLUSION: The NaviTip system and endodontic pressure syringe showed the best root canal obturation, with the nearest to complete filling of the volumes of prepared root canals, while the insulin syringe was least effective.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app