We have located links that may give you full text access.
The mid-gestation triple test profile among women diagnosed with vasa previa.
PURPOSE: To assess the mid-trimester triple test biomarkers among women diagnosed with vasa previa (VP).
METHODS: The study included 43 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa between the years 1988 and 2011. The mid-gestation screening test for Down syndrome was calculated from the combination of triple serum markers and maternal age, and expressed as a multiple of the gestation specific normal mean (MoM). Reference MoM values were calculated from the local population. The levels of mid-gestation maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and unconjugated estriol (uE3) of patients with VP were compared with control reference group.
RESULTS: The mean hCG and αFP levels of women diagnosed with VP was significantly higher compared to control reference group (1.42 versus 0.99 MoM; p < .002 and 1.24 versus1.01 MoM; p < .001, respectively). In contrast, there was no significant difference in uE3 levels between these two groups (0.99 versus 0.98 MoM; p = .71).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increased mid-gestation hCG and AFP were found among pregnancies complicated with VP. Clinicians should consider targeted scanning of pregnant women with risk factors for VP, including unexplained high maternal levels of hCG and αFP of the triple test, while conducting mid-gestation anomaly scan.
METHODS: The study included 43 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa between the years 1988 and 2011. The mid-gestation screening test for Down syndrome was calculated from the combination of triple serum markers and maternal age, and expressed as a multiple of the gestation specific normal mean (MoM). Reference MoM values were calculated from the local population. The levels of mid-gestation maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and unconjugated estriol (uE3) of patients with VP were compared with control reference group.
RESULTS: The mean hCG and αFP levels of women diagnosed with VP was significantly higher compared to control reference group (1.42 versus 0.99 MoM; p < .002 and 1.24 versus1.01 MoM; p < .001, respectively). In contrast, there was no significant difference in uE3 levels between these two groups (0.99 versus 0.98 MoM; p = .71).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increased mid-gestation hCG and AFP were found among pregnancies complicated with VP. Clinicians should consider targeted scanning of pregnant women with risk factors for VP, including unexplained high maternal levels of hCG and αFP of the triple test, while conducting mid-gestation anomaly scan.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app