We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Applying vacuum to accomplish reduced wound infections in laparoscopic pediatric surgery.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2017 May
INTRODUCTION: The prevention of surgical site infections has received little attention in pediatric surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy is used to treat complex wounds. We hypothesized that this principle could reduce wound infection rates following laparoscopic surgery. We tested this in a randomized controlled trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized pediatric patients with an umbilical port site to a standard dressing or a vacuum dressing. The dressings were removed 48h after surgery. A nurse blinded for the treatment inspected the umbilical wound between post-operative days 7-10 for infection. Data comparison was performed using a Fisher exact test with p<0.05 defined as significant.
RESULTS: We recruited 90 patients over 2 years and randomized 44 to the vacuum dressing arm and 42 to the control arm. We observed a 2.8% (n=1/35) infection rate in the vacuum dressing group and 3.3% (n=1/30) in the control group (p=1.0).
DISCUSSION: We ended our study early when an interim analysis showed an impractical number of patients would be required to achieve sufficient power. We did not find a significant difference between the control and vacuum dressings in reducing post-operative wound infections.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized pediatric patients with an umbilical port site to a standard dressing or a vacuum dressing. The dressings were removed 48h after surgery. A nurse blinded for the treatment inspected the umbilical wound between post-operative days 7-10 for infection. Data comparison was performed using a Fisher exact test with p<0.05 defined as significant.
RESULTS: We recruited 90 patients over 2 years and randomized 44 to the vacuum dressing arm and 42 to the control arm. We observed a 2.8% (n=1/35) infection rate in the vacuum dressing group and 3.3% (n=1/30) in the control group (p=1.0).
DISCUSSION: We ended our study early when an interim analysis showed an impractical number of patients would be required to achieve sufficient power. We did not find a significant difference between the control and vacuum dressings in reducing post-operative wound infections.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app