Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The clinical outcomes of atlanto-axial arthrodesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - Assessment according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of atlanto-axial arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with cervical myelopathy using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ).

METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent surgery to treat atlanto-axial subluxation (AAS) were reviewed.

RESULTS: The rates of success rates for each domain were as follows: cervical spine function, 11 of 18 patients (61.1%); upper extremity function, 3 of 15 patients (20%); lower extremity function, 8 of 18 patients (44.4%); bladder function, 5 of 13 patients (38.5%); and quality of life, 3 of 20 patients (15%). Significant differences of success rate were found between the following domains: cervical spine function and upper extremity function, cervical spine function and the quality of life, and lower-extremity function and quality of life. There were significant differences in the pre- and post-surgery visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulders, and pain or numbness in the arms and hands.

CONCLUSION: Atlanto-axial arthrodesis in RA patients provided a better outcome for cervical spine function, with improvement in VAS scores for pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulders. This surgery provided improvement of pain or numbness of the upper extremities but not of upper-extremity function. In contrast, the surgery achieved a relatively good recovery in lower-extremity function but little improvement of pain or numbness of the lower extremities. The success rate with regard to quality of life was found to be significantly lower than the success rates observed for cervical spine function and lower-extremity function.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app