Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Use of stepwise lactate kinetics-oriented hemodynamic therapy could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia.

BACKGROUND: Setting lactate kinetics at >30% might improve the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia. The aim of this study was to explore the outcome benefits of stepwise lactate kinetics vs central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 )-oriented hemodynamic therapy at 6 h as the protocol goal during early resuscitation.

METHODS: The relevant parameters and adverse events after different targets in 360 randomly assigned patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia were recorded and compared.

RESULTS: Heart rate (HR) at 48 h in the ScvO2 group was higher than in the lactate kinetics group (105 ± 19 bpm vs 99 ± 20 bpm, P = 0.040). The liquid balance at 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h in the lactate kinetics group was larger than in the ScvO2 group (1535 (1271-1778) ml vs 826 (631-1219) ml, P < 0.001; 1688 (1173-1923) ml vs 1277 (962 - 1588) ml, P <0.001; and 1510 (904-2087) ml vs 1236 (740-1808) ml, P = 0.005), respectively. Mortality was higher in the ScvO2 group (27.9% vs 18.3%, P = 0.033), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of stay in the ICU or mechanical ventilation. In terms of new onset organ dysfunction, there was a significant difference between the two groups in total bilirubin at 48 h and 72 h. Based on the 60-day survival curves, there was significantly more mortality in the ScvO2 group than in the lactate kinetics group (X 2  = 4.133, P = 0.042). In addition, fewer adverse events occurred in the lactate kinetics group.

CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise lactate kinetics-oriented hemodynamic therapy can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia compared with ScvO2 -oriented therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, NCT02566460 . Registered on 26 September 2015.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app