We have located links that may give you full text access.
The fetal cerebro-placental ratio in diabetic pregnancies is influenced more by the umbilical artery rather than middle cerebral artery pulsatility index.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relationship between the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) and intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pre-existing insulin dependent diabetes (pT1DM) mellitus, pre-existing non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (pT2DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1281 women with diabetes mellitus birthing at the Mater Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane between 2007 and 2015. The CPR in non-anomalous singleton fetuses was measured between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks gestation and compared between types of DM treatment groups and correlated with intrapartum and perinatal outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the study cohort, 9.7% (124/1281) had pT1DM, 5.3% (68/1281) had pT2DM and 85.0% (1089/1281) had GDM. Of women with pT2DM and GDM, 61.8% (42/68) and 28.9% (315/1089) respectively, required insulin during pregnancy. Women with pT1DM had an increased odds of having a CPR <5th centile (OR 3.73, 95%CI: 1.90-6.96, p=0.0001) or a CPR <10th centile (OR 3.01, 95% CI: 1.80-4.91, p<0.0001) respectively. The odds of a UA PI >90th centile (OR 2.69, 95% CI: 1.60-4.39, p=0.0001) was higher in the pT1DM cohort. There was however no significant difference in the mean MCA PI between the three groups. Stratification by CPR centiles (<10th centile vs. ≥10th centile) demonstrated a lower birth weight in the CPR <10th centile cohort for all DM categories. The proportion of neonates with birth weights <10th centile were higher in the CPR <10th centile cohort with the GDM cohort having an odds ratio of 8.28 (95% CI 4.22-16.13, p<0.0001) of this complication. The CPR <10th centile cohort also had a greater proportion of adverse composite neonatal outcome regardless of type of DM.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the type of DM, a low CPR was associated with poorer neonatal outcomes. Women with pT1DM also had the highest mean UA PI and lowest mean CPR despite no difference in the mean MCA PI between the three groups.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1281 women with diabetes mellitus birthing at the Mater Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane between 2007 and 2015. The CPR in non-anomalous singleton fetuses was measured between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks gestation and compared between types of DM treatment groups and correlated with intrapartum and perinatal outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the study cohort, 9.7% (124/1281) had pT1DM, 5.3% (68/1281) had pT2DM and 85.0% (1089/1281) had GDM. Of women with pT2DM and GDM, 61.8% (42/68) and 28.9% (315/1089) respectively, required insulin during pregnancy. Women with pT1DM had an increased odds of having a CPR <5th centile (OR 3.73, 95%CI: 1.90-6.96, p=0.0001) or a CPR <10th centile (OR 3.01, 95% CI: 1.80-4.91, p<0.0001) respectively. The odds of a UA PI >90th centile (OR 2.69, 95% CI: 1.60-4.39, p=0.0001) was higher in the pT1DM cohort. There was however no significant difference in the mean MCA PI between the three groups. Stratification by CPR centiles (<10th centile vs. ≥10th centile) demonstrated a lower birth weight in the CPR <10th centile cohort for all DM categories. The proportion of neonates with birth weights <10th centile were higher in the CPR <10th centile cohort with the GDM cohort having an odds ratio of 8.28 (95% CI 4.22-16.13, p<0.0001) of this complication. The CPR <10th centile cohort also had a greater proportion of adverse composite neonatal outcome regardless of type of DM.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the type of DM, a low CPR was associated with poorer neonatal outcomes. Women with pT1DM also had the highest mean UA PI and lowest mean CPR despite no difference in the mean MCA PI between the three groups.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app