Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Aims: We hypothesized that the greater the intra- or interventricular dyssynchrony (intraD, interD), the more effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is. We sought to improve patient selection for CRT by using novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria.

Methods and results: Left ventricular (LV) intraD was estimated by the absolute time difference between the intrinsicoid deflections (ID) in leads aVL and aVF divided by the QRS duration (QRSd): [aVLID - aVFID]/QRSd (%). InterD was estimated from the formula: [V5ID - V1ID]/QRSd (%). Their >25% value indicated electrical dyssynchrony present (ED+) and ≤25% value electrical dyssynchrony absent (ED-) diagnoses. Using the intraD + interD criteria (intra + interDC) together, if at least one of them indicated ED+ diagnosis, a final ED+ diagnosis, if both indicated ED- diagnosis, a final ED- diagnosis was made. Two authors, blinded to CRT response, retrospectively analysed pre-CRT ECGs of 124 patients with known CRT outcome. CRT response was defined as improvement of ≥ 1 NYHA class, being alive and having no hospitalizations for heart failure during 6 months of follow-up. 35/124 (28%) patients were non-responders (NRs), using the traditional criteria (TC) correct diagnosis was made in the remaining 89/124 (72%) responder (R) cases. The test accuracy (TA) of intra + interDC + TC [100/124 (81%), P < 0.001] was superior to that of TC [89/124 (72%)] due to its superior TA [36/43 (84%) vs. 29/43 (67%), respectively, P = 0.0156] in the non-specific intra-ventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) subgroup [43/124 (35%)]. In the left bundle branch block subgroup [70/124 (56%)] there was no between-criteria difference in TA.

Conclusion: The intra + interDC + TC predicts clinical response after CRT more accurately than TC alone, due to greater TA in the NICD subgroup.