Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A study comparing the safety and efficacy of febuxostat, allopurinol, and benzbromarone in Chinese gout patients: a retrospective cohort study .

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of three urate lowering agents: febuxostat, allopurinol, and benzbromarone, when used to treat Chinese gout patients.

METHODS: A total of 120 patients treated in our department from November 2011 to December 2014 were randomly selected and divided into four groups: febuxostat (40 mg per day), febuxostat (80 mg per day), allopurinol (100 mg, 3 × per day) or benzbromarone (50 mg per day), (n = 30 patients/group). The serum uric acid (UA) concentrations of the patients in each group were recorded and compared from week 2 through week 24 after the treatments, and all adverse events were evaluated to determine the safety of the various treatment regimens.

RESULTS: Treatment with febuxostat (40 mg) significantly reduced serum UA levels to those achieved with allopurinol or benzbromarone treatment. The treatment with febuxostat (80 mg) produced the best therapeutic effect and achieved the targeted UA level as early as week 2. However, the total number of patients experiencing adverse events was significantly higher in the febuxostat 80-mg group. The incidences of abnormal liver function, hyperlipidemia, and gout flare were higher in both febuxostat treatment groups. The allopurinol group had a higher incidence of hypersensitivity, and the benzbromarone group had a higher incidence of renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSION: Chinese patients treated with the 40-mg dose of febuxostat experienced a treatment effect and total rate of adverse events similar to those produced by allopurinol or benzbromarone. To achieve a better therapeutic effect, the dose of febuxostat can be elevated to 80 mg per day; however, patients receiving the higher dose must be closely monitored for signs of liver dysfunction. Febuxostat is an alternative treatment for Chinese gout patients who are at a much higher risk for severe cutaneous adverse reactions as well as for patients with a history of kidney stones.
.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app