Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Repeated human leukocyte antigen mismatches in lung re-transplantation.

Transplant Immunology 2017 Februrary
BACKGROUND: The role of HLA-sensitization in the absence of detectable DSA in lung re-transplantation is unclear. Antigens of the second donor matching the HLA typing of the first donor are considered 'unacceptable', by some tissue typing laboratories, especially in kidney re-transplantation.

METHODS: Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis of all lung re-transplantations focussing on the impact of HLA-homologies between the first and the second donor ('unacceptable' antigens; repeated HLA mismatch) on patient and graft survival.

RESULTS: A total of 132 lung re-transplantations were performed at our centre between 1985 and 2014, of which 120 with complete HLA data were analysed. 55.8% of the recipients received re-transplants with repeated HLA mismatched antigens whereas 43.2% of the re-transplants were transplanted without repeated HLA mismatched antigens. Postoperative survival showed no difference between re-transplant procedures with or without repeated HLA mismatches (p=0.99). While neither homologies on the HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DR locus, nor the addition of several locus homologies (p=0.72) had an impact on survival, unexpectedly, repeated HLA mismatching on the HLA-DQ locus was correlated with better survival. Re-transplantations with repeated HLA mismatches did not result in more development of CLAD as compared to recipients without repeated HLA mismatches (p=0.99). Neither the number of repeated HLA mismatched antigens (p=0.52) nor the HLA locus (HLA-A(p=0.34), HLA-B(p=0.97), HLA-C (p=0.80), HLA-DR(p=0.49) and HLA-DQ(p=0.07)) had an impact on the development of CLAD after re-transplantation.

CONCLUSION: Transplantation with repeated HLA mismatches due to sensitization by a previous transplantation in the absence of detectable HLA-antibodies does not have a negative impact on patient or graft survival.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app