We have located links that may give you full text access.
Localized bone regeneration around dental implants using recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 and platelet-derived growth factor-BB in the canine.
Clinical Oral Implants Research 2017 November
OBJECTIVES: To test whether or not one of two biological mediators (recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF-BB)) is superior to the other and compared with control groups for bone regeneration around implants based on histomorphometrical outcome measures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Box-type defects (10 × 5 × 5 mm) were prepared on the buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in ten mongrel dogs. Implants were placed at each site, the defects either received (i) bovine-derived particulated bone mineral (DBBM) mixed with rhBMP-2 and a collagen membrane (CM) (DBBM/BMP-2), (ii) DBBM mixed with rhPDGF-BB and CM (DBBM/PDGF), (iii) DBBM and CM (DBBM) and (iv) empty control (control). Animals were euthanized post-surgery at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Histomorphometrical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The mean percentages of regenerated area within total defect area amounted to 56.95% for DBBM/BMP-2, 48.86% for DBBM/PDFG, 33.44% for DBBM and 1.59% for control at 8 weeks, and 26.79% for DBBM/BMP-2, 23.78% for DBBM/PDFG, 30.21% for DBBM and 5.07% for control at 16 weeks with no statistically significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean amount of regenerated bone was 26.97% for DBBM/BMP-2, 22.02% for DBBM/PDFG, 5.03% for DBBM and 1.25% for control at 8 weeks, and at 16 weeks, these values were lower in the two groups with biological mediators (DBBM/BMP-2 = 13.35%; DBBM/PDGF = 6.96%) and only slightly increased in group DBBM (10.68%) and the control group (4.95%) compared with 8 weeks. The first bone-to-implant contact values on the buccal side were minimal for DBBM/BMP-2 (0.57 mm) and maximal for control (3.72 mm) at 8 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of biological mediators (rhBMP-2 and rhPDGF-BB) can increase the amount of bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects compared with controls at 8 weeks, but not at 16 weeks due to enhanced hard tissue remodeling processes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Box-type defects (10 × 5 × 5 mm) were prepared on the buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in ten mongrel dogs. Implants were placed at each site, the defects either received (i) bovine-derived particulated bone mineral (DBBM) mixed with rhBMP-2 and a collagen membrane (CM) (DBBM/BMP-2), (ii) DBBM mixed with rhPDGF-BB and CM (DBBM/PDGF), (iii) DBBM and CM (DBBM) and (iv) empty control (control). Animals were euthanized post-surgery at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Histomorphometrical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The mean percentages of regenerated area within total defect area amounted to 56.95% for DBBM/BMP-2, 48.86% for DBBM/PDFG, 33.44% for DBBM and 1.59% for control at 8 weeks, and 26.79% for DBBM/BMP-2, 23.78% for DBBM/PDFG, 30.21% for DBBM and 5.07% for control at 16 weeks with no statistically significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean amount of regenerated bone was 26.97% for DBBM/BMP-2, 22.02% for DBBM/PDFG, 5.03% for DBBM and 1.25% for control at 8 weeks, and at 16 weeks, these values were lower in the two groups with biological mediators (DBBM/BMP-2 = 13.35%; DBBM/PDGF = 6.96%) and only slightly increased in group DBBM (10.68%) and the control group (4.95%) compared with 8 weeks. The first bone-to-implant contact values on the buccal side were minimal for DBBM/BMP-2 (0.57 mm) and maximal for control (3.72 mm) at 8 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of biological mediators (rhBMP-2 and rhPDGF-BB) can increase the amount of bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects compared with controls at 8 weeks, but not at 16 weeks due to enhanced hard tissue remodeling processes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app