Socioeconomic status is associated with urinary diversion utilization after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess socioeconomic disparities in urinary diversion utilization in a contemporary American cohort.

METHODS: In the National Cancer Database, we identified 4538 patients who underwent cystectomy with urinary diversion for clinical T1-2N0M0 bladder cancer from 2010 to 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of urinary diversion type: ileal conduit (IC), continent cutaneous reservoir (CCR), or orthotopic neobladder (ON). Covariates included age, gender, race, income, Charlson score, clinical T stage, hospital cystectomy volume, teaching status, and surgical approach. Subgroup analysis by hospital volume (low, intermediate, or high) and teaching status (academic or non-academic) was performed to ascertain the impact of regionalization on urinary diversion use.

RESULTS: The final cohort included 4066 (89.6 %) patients with IC, 292 (6.4 %) with CCR, and 180 (4.0 %) with ON. On multivariable analysis, younger age (p < .01), higher income (p < .01), and high cystectomy volume predicted increased use of CCR and ON. Female gender predicted increased use of CCR versus IC (p < .01), and academic hospital status predicted increased use of ON versus IC (p = .04). On subgroup analysis, after further adjustment for hospital volume and teaching status, higher income remained an independent predictor of ON use.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite regionalization of care, higher income patients are more likely to receive complex urinary diversions after radical cystectomy. Other related socioeconomic factors, especially patient education, may influence this practice pattern.