Contrast-Enhanced High-Pitch Computed Tomography in Pediatric Patients Without Electrocardiography Triggering and Sedation: Comparison of Cardiac Image Quality With Conventional Multidetector Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare image quality of anatomical cardiac details without electrocardiography triggering, sedation, or heart rate-regulating drugs in contrast-enhanced pediatric chest computed tomography (CT), using high-pitch CT (HPCT) versus conventional pitch-mode technique (multidetector CT [MDCT]).

METHODS: After written informed consent, 55 patients (median age, 11 years; range, 3-17 years) were prospectively included in this institutional review board-approved study. Patients underwent clinically indicated, contrast-enhanced MDCT or HPCT of the chest.Image quality was assessed evaluating morphological criteria on a 3-point scale (from 1, high, to 3, low detail) and summed up in a global score (from 4, best, to 12, poor image quality). Artifacts were analyzed correspondingly (from 3, low, to 9, severe artifacts). Effective dose and size-specific dose estimate were calculated for all scans.

RESULTS: Cardiac image quality was higher in HPCT than in MDCT (7.1 [1.6] vs 8.8 [1.9], P < 0.001). Nevertheless, HPCT showed limitations in image quality, especially concerning the heart valves (2.5 [0.6] and 1.7 [0.5]) and coronary arteries (1.8 [0.6). Artifact score (3.4 [0.6 vs 5.1 [0.9, P < 0.001), effective dose (1.6 [1.3] vs 2.3 [1.6] mSv, P = 0.047), and size-specific dose estimate (2.5 [1.7] vs 4.1 [2.3] mGy, P = 0.002) were lower in HPCT compared with those in MDCT.

CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, contrast-enhanced HPCT of the chest provides high image quality without electrocardiography triggering or sedation, although image quality is somewhat limited for a detailed depiction of cardiac anatomy.