Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative in vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefovecin, cefazolin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial eradication is necessary for clinical cure of infections and antimicrobial agents are important adjunctive therapies for inhibiting the growth of or killing bacteria. Pre-existing skin diseases predispose animals to infection by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and, more rarely, by Gram-negative bacilli. The property of rapid killing of bacteria may influence drug selection and duration of therapy in the setting of infection.

OBJECTIVES: To test the killing of canine isolates of S. pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin at the minimum inhibitory, mutant prevention, maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentrations.

METHODS: Under standard conditions, bacterial cells were exposed to clinically relevant drug concentrations in vitro and the log10 reduction (and % kill) of viable cells measured at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after drug exposure.

RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were seen between killing efficiencies by pradofloxacin versus the other agents, whereby pradofloxacin killed cells more rapidly than the others. For example, against the S. pseudintermedius strains, significantly more cells were killed by pradofloxacin following 15 min of maximum tissue drug concentration exposure than for cefazolin (P = 0.0002), cefovecin (P = 0.0007) and doxycycline (P ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The rank order of potency based on these kill experiments was pradofloxacin > cefazolin > cefovecin > doxycycline. Rapid killing of bacteria affects the speed of clinical resolution and may influence drug selection and duration of therapy for skin infections.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app