Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Perinatal outcome comparing triplets and singleton births at a reference maternity hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate adverse perinatal outcome in a group of high order pregnancies pared with singletons by BW and GA at birth.

METHODS: Data was reviewed for all admissions of triplets and quadruplets in a 7 year period. For each study neonate we selected two singleton infants to constitute a control group. Variables analyzed included: respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity and periventricular leukomalacia.

RESULTS: We studied a total of 128 multiple and 260 singleton infants. Mean gestational age and birth weight were similar in both groups (31.3 ± 2,5 wks e 31.5 ± 2,8 wks; 1470 ± 461 g vs 1495 ± 540 g). There was no significant difference between the groups in the majority of main morbidities. The incidence of NEC was higher in triplets (6.3 vs 0.8%, p value <0.01). Mortality was higher in singletons (9.6 vs 3.1%, p value <0.037).

CONCLUSIONS: Results show that major neonatal outcomes are very similar between multiples and singletons births when paired by gestational age and birth weight. NEC remained a significant morbidity in infants born from multiple gestations after adjustment for maternal and neonatal risk factors.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app