We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Stability of liver proton density fat fraction and changes in R 2* measurements induced by administering gadoxetic acid at 3T MRI.
Abdominal Radiology 2016 August
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R 2* measurements in the presence of changes in tissue relaxation rates induced by administrating gadoxetic acid, using two different image reconstruction methods at 3T MRI.
METHODS: Forty-five patients were imaged at 3T with chemical-shift-based MRI sequences before and 20 min after administration of gadoxetic acid. Image reconstructions were performed using hybrid and complex methods to obtain PDFF and R 2* images. A single radiologist measured PDFF and R 2* values on precontrast and postcontrast images. Precontrast and postcontrast PDFF values were compared using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), linear regression, and Bland-Altman analysis. Changes in R 2* values from precontrast to postcontrast were correlated with relative liver enhancement (RLE) based on signal intensities on T 1-weighted images using Spearman's rank correlation.
RESULTS: PDFF values were similar between precontrast and postcontrast images (ICC = 0.99, linear regression slopes = 0.98, mean difference = -0.21 to -0.31%). PDFF measurements were stable between precontrast and postcontrast images. Changes in R 2* values were correlated with RLE (p < 0.001, r = 0.49-0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: PDFF measurements from both image reconstruction methods are stable in the presence of changes in tissue relaxation rates after administering gadoxetic acid at 3T MRI. Changes in R 2* values correlate with established measures of gadoxetic acid uptake based on T 1-weighted images.
METHODS: Forty-five patients were imaged at 3T with chemical-shift-based MRI sequences before and 20 min after administration of gadoxetic acid. Image reconstructions were performed using hybrid and complex methods to obtain PDFF and R 2* images. A single radiologist measured PDFF and R 2* values on precontrast and postcontrast images. Precontrast and postcontrast PDFF values were compared using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), linear regression, and Bland-Altman analysis. Changes in R 2* values from precontrast to postcontrast were correlated with relative liver enhancement (RLE) based on signal intensities on T 1-weighted images using Spearman's rank correlation.
RESULTS: PDFF values were similar between precontrast and postcontrast images (ICC = 0.99, linear regression slopes = 0.98, mean difference = -0.21 to -0.31%). PDFF measurements were stable between precontrast and postcontrast images. Changes in R 2* values were correlated with RLE (p < 0.001, r = 0.49-0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: PDFF measurements from both image reconstruction methods are stable in the presence of changes in tissue relaxation rates after administering gadoxetic acid at 3T MRI. Changes in R 2* values correlate with established measures of gadoxetic acid uptake based on T 1-weighted images.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app