Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Contemporary utilization and safety outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial flutter in the United States: Analysis of 89,638 procedures.

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter (AFL) ablation has been increasingly offered as first-line therapy and safely performed over the last decades. However, limited data exist regarding current utilization and trends in adverse outcomes arising from this procedure.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to examine the frequency of adverse events attributable to AFL ablation and influence of hospital volume on safety outcomes.

METHODS: Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer inpatient dataset in the United States. Patients with AFL who underwent catheter ablation from 2000 to 2011 were identified using ICD-9 codes. In-hospital death and common complications were identified, including cardiac perforation and tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and vascular access complications.

RESULTS: A total of 89,638 AFL patients were treated with catheter ablation during our study period. Total number of ablations performed increased by 154% from 2000 to 2011. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.17% and the overall complication rate was 3.17%. Cardiac complications (1.44%) were the most frequent, followed by respiratory (0.88%), vascular (0.78%), and neurological complications (0.05%). Low hospital volume (<50 procedures/year) was significantly associated with increased adverse outcomes. Overall frequency of complications per 100 ablation procedures increased from 2.86 in 2000 to 5.39 in 2011 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate was 3.17% in patients undergoing AFL ablation. There was a significant association between low hospital volume and increased adverse outcomes. This suggests a need for future research into identifying the safety measures in AFL ablations and instituting appropriate interventions to improve overall AFL ablation outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app