Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Use of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Combined With CA-125 to Distinguish Endometriomas From Other Benign Ovarian Cysts.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) compared to CA-125 in patients with endometriomas.

METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective comparative study. A total of 807 women who underwent surgery due to benign ovarian cysts between January 2008 and January 2013 were included in the study. The NLR and CA-125 levels were assessed separately and together, with a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for the diagnosis of endometriomas.

RESULTS: The mean serum levels of NLR, CA-125, and combined markers were significantly higher in the study group (all P < .001). According to the highest Youden index, the cutoff values were found to be 23.7 IU/mL for CA-125 at 75% sensitivity and 81% specificity and 1.89 for NLR at 70% sensitivity and 74% specificity. The cutoff value for the combined marker was 41.0 with 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. There was a positive correlation between NLR and CA-125 (P < .001). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was also positively correlated with the endometriosis score (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Although NLR is a simple and easily applicable marker, CA-125 is superior for differentiating endometriomas from other benign ovarian cysts. The combination of these 2 markers improves diagnostic accuracy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app