Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of the Accuracy and Cut-Failure Rates of Eye Bank-Cut Corneas for Use in Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Comparison of Outcomes Between 2010 and 2013.

Cornea 2015 November
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of eye bank-prepared precut donor corneas over time by comparing cut-failure rates and corneal thickness measurements in 2010 and 2013.

METHODS: A total of 2511 human corneas cut by a technician-operated mechanical microkeratome intended for endothelial keratoplasty were evaluated prospectively at one large eye bank facility in 2010 and in 2013. The endothelium was evaluated by slit lamp, and specular microscopy both before and after cutting was performed. Graft thickness as measured by pachymetry and/or optical coherence tomography was collected to assess the accuracy of the cut tissue. Cut-failure rates were compared between normal donor tissue and tissue with significant preexisting scarring.

RESULTS: The combined cut-failure rate in 2010 and 2013 was 2.3% (23/1000) and 1.6% (24/1511), respectively (P = 0.23). The cut-failure rate among normal tissue in 2010 and 2013 was 2.0% (19/927) and 1.4% (19/1400), respectively (P = 0.24). The cut-failure rate among previously scarred tissue in 2010 and 2013 was 5.5% (4/73) and 4.5% (5/111), respectively (P = 0.74). The mean surgeon-requested graft thickness was 144.7 μm (range 100-150, SD 13.6) and 127.2 μm (range 75-150, SD 25.2) in 2010 and 2013, respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean deviation from target graft thickness was 21.3 μm (SD 16.3) and 13.6 μm (SD 12.5) in 2010 and 2013, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2013, the combined cut-failure rates trended toward improvement, while the accuracy of graft thickness improved. This study suggests that the accuracy and success rates of tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty improve with experience and volume.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app