Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Occupational Outcomes and Return to Running Following Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures in a High-Demand Population.

BACKGROUND: Literature evaluating surgical outcomes after ankle fixation in an active patient population is limited. This study determined occupational outcomes and return to running following ankle fracture fixation in a military cohort.

METHODS: All service members undergoing ankle fracture fixation at a single military hospital from August 2007 to August 2012 were reviewed. Univariate analysis determined the association between patient demographic information, type of fracture fixation, and the development of posttraumatic ankle arthritis and functional outcomes, including medical separation, return to running, and reoperation. Seventy-two primary ankle fracture fixation procedures were performed on patients with mean age of 29.1 years. The majority of patients were male (88%), were 25 years of age or older (61%), were of junior rank (57%), underwent unimalleolar fracture fixation (78%), and did not require syndesmotic fixation (54%). The average follow-up was 35.9 months.

RESULTS: The mean time to radiographic union was 8.6 weeks. Twelve service members (17%) were medically separated from the military due to refractory pain following ankle fracture fixation with a minimum of 2-year occupational follow-up. Among military service members undergoing ankle fracture fixation, 64% returned to running. Service members with higher occupational demands had a statistical trend to return to running (odds ratio [OR] 2.49; 95% CI, 0.93-6.68). Junior enlisted rank was a risk factor for medical separation (OR 11.00; 95% CI, 1.34-90.57). Radiographic evidence of posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis occurred in 8 (11%) service members.

CONCLUSIONS: At mean 3-year follow-up, 83% of service members undergoing ankle fracture fixation remained on active duty or successfully completed their military service, while nearly two-thirds returned to occupationally required daily running.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app