Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement.

OBJECTIVES: To determine intra- and interobserver reliability of evaluating the appearance and measurement of Cesarean hysterotomy scars using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS), with and without saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH), in non-pregnant women.

METHODS: Fifty-six women with one previous Cesarean delivery were examined by TVS, with and without contrast enhancement, 6-9 months after the Cesarean delivery. Two observers, blinded to their own and each other's measurements, evaluated the appearance of the hysterotomy scar and measured the myometrial thickness adjacent to the scar or scar defect (MTS). If a scar defect was noted, the remaining myometrial thickness over the defect (RMT) was measured. A scar defect was defined as large if RMT was ≤ 2.2 mm on conventional TVS and ≤ 2.5 mm when SCSH was performed. Intra- and interobserver reliability of conventional TVS and SCSH were assessed.

RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of ≥ 0.97 for measurements of MTS and RMT on conventional TVS and SCSH. Interobserver ICCs for measurements obtained on SCSH were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91) for MTS and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98) for RMT, compared with 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for MTS and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95) for RMT measured on conventional TVS. The kappa coefficient for measurements obtained on SCSH was 0.92, compared with 0.85 for conventional TVS. Intermethod ICC was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92) for measurement of MTS and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.95) for measurement of RMT, with a kappa coefficient of 0.57.

CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of RMT using SCSH is a reliable method for assessing Cesarean hysterotomy scars in non-pregnant women and can be used in clinical practice. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app