We have located links that may give you full text access.
Three-dimensional evaluation of the danger zone of ethmoidal foramens on the frontoethmoidal suture line on the medial orbital wall.
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : SRA 2015 October
INTRODUCTION: It is clear that the importance of the ethmoidal foramen (EF) is based on its vascular contents. The frontoethmoidal suture (FS) line is recommended as more reliable navigational landmark for identifying the EF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vertical orientation between the EF and the FS line was studied in 188 orbits using a computer software program.
RESULTS: 146 anterior EFs (77.7 %) and 42 anterior EFs (22.3 %) were situated in the FS line as intrasutural and extrasutural, respectively. 146 posterior EFs (77.25 %) and 8 posterior EFs (4.25 %) were presented as intrasutural and extrasutural, respectively. Although accessory EFs were detected in 25.5 % specimen exhibited an extrasutural location. Majority of the EFs (1-4 EFs) were situated on the FS line. The mean distances from the FS and the anterior EF, the posterior EF and the accessory EF were measured as 2.1 ± 0.5, 2.0 ± 1.5 and 2.3 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The range of the distances from the FS to the anterior EF, posterior EF and accessory EF were -1.2 to 3.32 , -1.02 to 5.76 and -1.1 to 3.65 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ranges of EF changed within 1-6 mm. As the FS is not a single point, it is more suitable to make the incision 7 mm above the suture line. The data from this study to help the orbital surgeons explain and avoid unexpected hemorrhage during the orbital procedures such as posttraumatic orbital reconstruction, orbital tumor resections, anterior skull base reconstruction, and orbital decompression surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vertical orientation between the EF and the FS line was studied in 188 orbits using a computer software program.
RESULTS: 146 anterior EFs (77.7 %) and 42 anterior EFs (22.3 %) were situated in the FS line as intrasutural and extrasutural, respectively. 146 posterior EFs (77.25 %) and 8 posterior EFs (4.25 %) were presented as intrasutural and extrasutural, respectively. Although accessory EFs were detected in 25.5 % specimen exhibited an extrasutural location. Majority of the EFs (1-4 EFs) were situated on the FS line. The mean distances from the FS and the anterior EF, the posterior EF and the accessory EF were measured as 2.1 ± 0.5, 2.0 ± 1.5 and 2.3 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The range of the distances from the FS to the anterior EF, posterior EF and accessory EF were -1.2 to 3.32 , -1.02 to 5.76 and -1.1 to 3.65 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ranges of EF changed within 1-6 mm. As the FS is not a single point, it is more suitable to make the incision 7 mm above the suture line. The data from this study to help the orbital surgeons explain and avoid unexpected hemorrhage during the orbital procedures such as posttraumatic orbital reconstruction, orbital tumor resections, anterior skull base reconstruction, and orbital decompression surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app