Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Variability of oxygenation in possible hepatopulmonary syndrome: effects of requiring two abnormal arterial blood gas results for diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) affects 10-32 % of patients with cirrhosis and is defined by liver abnormalities, intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVDs), and abnormal oxygenation. However, published criteria for abnormal oxygenation are inconsistent. We sought to evaluate variation in oxygenation over time and to compare various diagnostic criteria for validity, based on their diagnostic stability over time and ability to identify patients with clinically relevant findings.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed oxygenation and diffusion capacity in patients with liver abnormalities and IPVDs who had ≥ 2 arterial blood gases (ABGs) at the University of Toronto or Universite de Montreal. We compared the performance of nine possible oxygenation criteria for HPS and for each explored whether validity improved when requiring two consecutive abnormal ABGs on different days.

RESULTS: Mean PaO2 was 68.4 mmHg and annual within-patient coefficient of variation 6.3 % (58 patients). Applying published criteria, 8.6-15.5 % of patients initially diagnosed with HPS no longer met the criterion for HPS on a subsequent ABG (re-classified). Requiring two consecutive abnormal ABGs on different days: (1) reduced the proportion of re-classified patients (9/9 criteria); (2) identified patients with more rapid progression in hypoxemia and greater difference in rate of progression between HPS and non-HPS (7/9 criteria); and (3) identified patients with lower diffusion and a larger difference in diffusion between HPS and non-HPS (8/9 criteria).

CONCLUSIONS: Oxygenation is variable in this population, and requiring two abnormal results might reduce misdiagnosis and better differentiate patients with and without HPS according to clinically relevant markers of disease.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app