We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Relationship of complement activation route with clinical manifestations in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective observational study.
Modern Rheumatology 2015 March
OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between the complement activation route and clinical manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
METHODS: Patients with SLE in whom complement activation occurred were divided into two groups: those in whom the complement system was mainly activated through the classical pathway (low serum C3 and C4 levels; CP group); and those in whom the complement system was solely activated through the alternative pathway (low serum C3 with normal C4 levels; AP group). Clinical manifestations were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The CP group had higher frequencies of arthritis, serositis, and nephritis, and a higher prevalence of anti-DNA antibodies compared to the AP group (arthritis: 50.0% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.0014; serositis: 37.5% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.0257; nephritis: 63.6% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.0003; anti-DNA antibodies: 73.9% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.0001). In contrast, the AP group had a higher frequency of anti-phospholipid (anti-PL) antibodies and a higher prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (anti-PL antibodies: 70.6% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.0136; APS: 39.1% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a different complement system mechanism may act in the pathogenesis of APS in patients with SLE.
METHODS: Patients with SLE in whom complement activation occurred were divided into two groups: those in whom the complement system was mainly activated through the classical pathway (low serum C3 and C4 levels; CP group); and those in whom the complement system was solely activated through the alternative pathway (low serum C3 with normal C4 levels; AP group). Clinical manifestations were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The CP group had higher frequencies of arthritis, serositis, and nephritis, and a higher prevalence of anti-DNA antibodies compared to the AP group (arthritis: 50.0% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.0014; serositis: 37.5% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.0257; nephritis: 63.6% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.0003; anti-DNA antibodies: 73.9% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.0001). In contrast, the AP group had a higher frequency of anti-phospholipid (anti-PL) antibodies and a higher prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (anti-PL antibodies: 70.6% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.0136; APS: 39.1% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a different complement system mechanism may act in the pathogenesis of APS in patients with SLE.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app