We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Validation Study
Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2014 Februrary
PURPOSE: To validate the discriminative ability of wavefront- and pachymetry-based corneal topographic metrics to detect subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Normal fellow eyes with early keratoconus and preoperative eyes with an uneventful follow-up without signs of iatrogenic keratectasia 12 months after laser in situ keratoconus were included. Zernike coefficients from the anterior and posterior surfaces and corneal thickness spatial profiles and corresponding discriminant functions were assessed for their usefulness to discriminate between eyes with subclinical keratoconus and normal eyes using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Discriminant functions were obtained from a previous study and constructed de novo from the present collective.
RESULTS: The anterior C(1,-1) and C(3,-1) coefficients had the highest area under the ROC curve (both 0.87). The anterior 5th-order root mean square (RMS) was the RMS value with the maximum area under the ROC curve (0.90). The discriminant function with input from anterior and posterior Zernike coefficients (DAP) and DAP including pachymetry data (DAPT) performed best (area under ROC curve 0.864 and 0.857, respectively). Applying cutoff values from a previous study resulted in a minimal drop in accuracy (0.0% to 1.3%). The construction of discriminant functions from the present dataset resulted in a gain in accuracy of between 3.5% and 9.6%, with DAPT reaching the maximum area under the ROC curve of 0.956.
CONCLUSION: Validation in a new and larger patient collective proved the usefulness of metrics based on corneal wavefront and pachymetry for the detection of subclinical keratoconus.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Normal fellow eyes with early keratoconus and preoperative eyes with an uneventful follow-up without signs of iatrogenic keratectasia 12 months after laser in situ keratoconus were included. Zernike coefficients from the anterior and posterior surfaces and corneal thickness spatial profiles and corresponding discriminant functions were assessed for their usefulness to discriminate between eyes with subclinical keratoconus and normal eyes using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Discriminant functions were obtained from a previous study and constructed de novo from the present collective.
RESULTS: The anterior C(1,-1) and C(3,-1) coefficients had the highest area under the ROC curve (both 0.87). The anterior 5th-order root mean square (RMS) was the RMS value with the maximum area under the ROC curve (0.90). The discriminant function with input from anterior and posterior Zernike coefficients (DAP) and DAP including pachymetry data (DAPT) performed best (area under ROC curve 0.864 and 0.857, respectively). Applying cutoff values from a previous study resulted in a minimal drop in accuracy (0.0% to 1.3%). The construction of discriminant functions from the present dataset resulted in a gain in accuracy of between 3.5% and 9.6%, with DAPT reaching the maximum area under the ROC curve of 0.956.
CONCLUSION: Validation in a new and larger patient collective proved the usefulness of metrics based on corneal wavefront and pachymetry for the detection of subclinical keratoconus.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app