Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Sponges and incorrect sponge count: Minor contributions to the process of detecting retained foreign bodies.

Background: Postoperative retained foreign bodies [RFBs] can be a serious event, but they are rare. The x-ray is the current gold standard to detect RFBs. There has been scant research on the process of detection as opposed to the consequence of RFBs. Surgical sponges incorporating automatic data identity capture technology (radiofrequency tags, barcodes) have been proposed to detect RFBs. Because resources in healthcare are scarce, careful consideration needs to be given to developing the right technology in order to maximize the process of RFB elimination. There have been few studies that identify factors contributing to the process of RFB detection. Study design: Our goal was to determine the frequency with which x-rays were ordered to detect abdominal surgery post operative RFBs and the indications for ordering them. We reviewed the Johns Hopkins Hospital's Department of Radiology database to retrospectively study the demographic and radiologic data on patients who underwent exploratory surgery for RFBs following abdominal procedures performed between April 2004 and April 2008. Results: Of the 13,335 portable abdominal x-rays taken during the period, 203 (1.5%) were ordered to assess patients for the presence of an RFB. Of these, 57 (28%) were taken because no RFB count was made (e.g., for emergency procedures), 57 (28%) were taken per procedure or protocol, 51 (25%) were taken because of an incorrect instrument count, and 39 (19%) were taken because of an incorrect sponge count. Of the 203 x-rays, 192 (95%) were negative for RFBs, 11 (5%) were positive or had suspicious findings, and of these 3 (2%) revealed more than 1 RFB. The 11 patients with positive or suspicious findings underwent exploratory procedures immediately during the same operation; of these, 8 (72%) actually had an RFB and 3 (28%) had a negative result at exploration. Conclusion: Multiple pathways lead to the decision to obtain X-rays for RFBs, of which sponges/Incorrect sponge counts make up only one in five. Therefore, technology that focuses on sponges alone may not majorly impact clinical outcome because x-rays will still be required in the majority of cases of suspected high risk.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app