Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Epidemiologic trends, occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production, and performance of ertapenem and comparators in patients with intra-abdominal infections: analysis of global trend data from 2002-2007 from the SMART study.

BACKGROUND: The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) is an ongoing surveillance study to monitor worldwide resistance trends among aerobic and facultative anaerobic gram-negative bacilli isolated from intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). Results from SMART in 2002 through 2005 have been reported; this report summarizes aggregated data from SMART 2002-2007 to identify epidemiologic trends over time.

METHODS: A cumulative total of 446 sites were involved, of which 119, 166, 66, 28, and 67 were in Asia/Pacific, Europe, Latin America, Middle East/Africa, and North America, respectively.

RESULTS: A total of 34,635 isolates were collected from IAIs during 2002-2007, of which 32,113 (92.7%) were from 12 species. The organisms isolated most commonly were Escherichia coli (47.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.9%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5%). The most frequent infection source associated with the 12 most common organisms consistently was peritoneal (46%), followed by intestine (15.8%) and liver (3.2%), with the majority of the organisms originating from inpatients (90.7%), followed by outpatients (4.3%) and undetermined sources (5.0%). Approximately 52% of these isolates were from patients with a hospital stay of > or = 48 h, with 45.5% from patients with a hospital stay of < 48 h. Overall, ertapenem and imipenem consistently were the most effective antibiotics, whereas resistance to other agents was more common.

CONCLUSIONS: Escherichia coli was the organism isolated most frequently from IAIs, of which the majority were from peritoneal and intestinal sources. Only the carbapenems maintained good activity against the majority of clinical isolates.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app