collection
https://read.qxmd.com/read/27344055/delayed-open-reduction-internal-fixation-of-missed-low-energy-lisfranc-injuries
#1
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Spenser J Cassinelli, Lewis K Moss, David C Lee, Jayme Phillips, Thomas G Harris
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of delayed presentation (at least 6 weeks from the time of injury) of low-energy Lisfranc injuries limited to the first and second tarsometatarsal joints treated with open reduction internal fixation. METHODS: 8 patients with an average age at surgery of 39.8 years were retrospectively reviewed with a mean time to surgery from injury of 15.1 (range of 6.3 to 31.1) weeks. We used radiographic measurements, physical examination, SF-12 scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, VAS scores and return to work or sports as outcome measures...
October 2016: Foot & Ankle International
https://read.qxmd.com/read/27267412/functional-outcomes-after-temporary-bridging-with-locking-plates-in-lisfranc-injuries
#2
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Paul J van Koperen, Vincent M de Jong, Jan S K Luitse, Tim Schepers
The standard operative treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations currently consists of open reduction and transarticular fixation. Recently, bridge plating has been used more often. Using joint spanning, the reduced fracture dislocation is temporary stabilized to minimize articular damage. The present study describes the outcomes of patients treated with bridge plating after tarsometatarsal fracture dislocations compared with transarticular screw fixation. A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with an isolated tarsometatarsal injury who had been treated operatively from June 2000 to October 2013 were included...
September 2016: Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
https://read.qxmd.com/read/26022112/does-open-reduction-and-internal-fixation-versus-primary-arthrodesis-improve-patient-outcomes-for-lisfranc-trauma-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis
#3
REVIEW
Nicholas Smith, Craig Stone, Andrew Furey
BACKGROUND: Although Lisfranc injuries are uncommon, representing approximately 0.2% of all fractures, they are complex and can result in persistent pain, degenerative arthritis, and loss of function. Both open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and primary fusion have been proposed as treatment options for these injuries, but debate remains as to which approach is better. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether ORIF or primary fusion led to (1) fewer reoperations for hardware removal; (2) less frequent revision surgery; (3) higher patient outcome scores; and (4) more frequent anatomic reduction...
June 2016: Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research
1
Fetch more papers »
Fetching more papers... Fetching...
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.