CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Scutumplasty: costal cartilage versus bone paté.

This study was carried out to evaluate the anatomical and hearing results of the reparation of attic defects in closed tympanoplasty. Reparation was carried out in 194 patients by using a costal cartilage allograft, and in 159 patients with a bone pate autograft. The follow-up was from 1 to 5 years. The study was not truly randomized owing to an occasional lack of allogenic costal cartilage. In the group 'costal cartilage' a partial resorption was observed in 5.7% and a complete resorption in 4.7% of the cases. In the group 'bone pate', partial resorption was observed in 5.5% and total resorption in 2.7% of the patients. Satisfactory hearing results were obtained in 86% of the patients of the group 'costal cartilage' and in 82% of the patients of the group 'bone paté'. Both graft materials may be recommended for repairing erosions caused by the cholesteatoma in the wall of the external auditory canal.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app