We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE II
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE III
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia.
Cornea 1997 September
PURPOSE: Because keratometry readings may no accurately reflect the refractive changes after keratorefractive surgery for myopia, better methods for the assessment of corneal curvature in the postsurgical cornea are needed.
METHODS: We developed a procedure to calculate the average central power (ACP) of the cornea within the entrance pupil from videokeratography. Videokeratograph-derived keratometry-style readings (average K; K) and calculated ACPs, as well as the differences between the two values, were compared in four groups: normal corneas (n = 30), corneas with regular astigmatism (n = 30); post-radial keratotomy corneas (RK, n = 85), and post-excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy corneas (PRK, n = 63). Intraocular lens (IOL) powers calculated by using K or ACP in the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff formula were compared.
RESULTS: In the groups with normal corneas or regular astigmatism, none of the eyes showed a difference between K and ACP > 0.25 D. However, six (7%) of the RK eyes and 16 (25%) of the PRK eyes had differences > 0.55 D; in these eyes, the disparity between IOL powers calculated by using K and IOL powers calculated by using ACP was > 0.5 D.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that basing the calculation of IOL powers on keratometry readings in patients who have undergone RK. PRK, or possibly other refractive procedures may result in a residual refractive error in some eyes. In particular, patients undergoing surgery involving a small optical zone or large attempted correction or both, as well as those with low postoperative keratometry readings, may be at risk for this problem if IOL placement becomes necessary in later years.
METHODS: We developed a procedure to calculate the average central power (ACP) of the cornea within the entrance pupil from videokeratography. Videokeratograph-derived keratometry-style readings (average K; K) and calculated ACPs, as well as the differences between the two values, were compared in four groups: normal corneas (n = 30), corneas with regular astigmatism (n = 30); post-radial keratotomy corneas (RK, n = 85), and post-excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy corneas (PRK, n = 63). Intraocular lens (IOL) powers calculated by using K or ACP in the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff formula were compared.
RESULTS: In the groups with normal corneas or regular astigmatism, none of the eyes showed a difference between K and ACP > 0.25 D. However, six (7%) of the RK eyes and 16 (25%) of the PRK eyes had differences > 0.55 D; in these eyes, the disparity between IOL powers calculated by using K and IOL powers calculated by using ACP was > 0.5 D.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that basing the calculation of IOL powers on keratometry readings in patients who have undergone RK. PRK, or possibly other refractive procedures may result in a residual refractive error in some eyes. In particular, patients undergoing surgery involving a small optical zone or large attempted correction or both, as well as those with low postoperative keratometry readings, may be at risk for this problem if IOL placement becomes necessary in later years.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app