We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Histamine-2-receptor blockade does not affect hyperemia after cerebral ischemia in young swine.
Critical Care Medicine 1993 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether histamine-2 (H2) receptor antagonists can blunt the increase in cerebral blood flow after cerebral ischemia.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial.
SETTING: Animal laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Piglets aged 1 to 2 wks.
INTERVENTIONS: Three groups of piglets were anesthetized with pentobarbital, mechanically ventilated, and hemodynamically monitored. Each animal was randomized to receive one of three treatments 20 mins before ischemia: famotidine (0.6 mg/kg i.v.), cimetidine (5 mg/kg i.v.), or an equivalent volume of saline (3 mL). Ischemia was maintained for 15 mins by tightening ligatures around the brachiocephalic trunk and left subclavian arteries plus the induction of hemorrhagic hypotension (50 mm Hg). Reperfusion was initiated by the reinfusion of shed blood and removal of the ligatures.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The three groups were not different with regard to baseline arterial blood gases, cerebral perfusion pressure, microsphere-determined cerebral blood flow, or oxygen consumption (VO2). Ischemia (cerebral blood flow < 5 mL/min/100 g of tissue) was demonstrated in all brain regions for all groups during arterial ligation with hemorrhage-induced hypotension. Blood flow rates were increased compared with preischemic values in all regions at 7 mins of reperfusion. For example, mean forebrain blood flow rates increased from 36 +/- 3 to 95 +/- 14 (SEM) mL/min/100 g of tissue in the group receiving saline, from 36 +/- 3 to 102 +/- 9 mL/min/100 g of tissue in the group receiving famotidine, and from 31 +/- 4 to 119 +/- 26 mL/min/100 g in the group receiving cimetidine. Overall, the three groups did not differ in regard to blood flow rates and cerebral VO2 values during ischemia and at 30 mins of reperfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that famotidine or cimetidine as compared with saline did not affect the pattern or extent of hyperemia after ischemia. This finding does not support the hypothesis that a H2-receptor mechanism is necessary for postischemic hyperemia.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial.
SETTING: Animal laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Piglets aged 1 to 2 wks.
INTERVENTIONS: Three groups of piglets were anesthetized with pentobarbital, mechanically ventilated, and hemodynamically monitored. Each animal was randomized to receive one of three treatments 20 mins before ischemia: famotidine (0.6 mg/kg i.v.), cimetidine (5 mg/kg i.v.), or an equivalent volume of saline (3 mL). Ischemia was maintained for 15 mins by tightening ligatures around the brachiocephalic trunk and left subclavian arteries plus the induction of hemorrhagic hypotension (50 mm Hg). Reperfusion was initiated by the reinfusion of shed blood and removal of the ligatures.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The three groups were not different with regard to baseline arterial blood gases, cerebral perfusion pressure, microsphere-determined cerebral blood flow, or oxygen consumption (VO2). Ischemia (cerebral blood flow < 5 mL/min/100 g of tissue) was demonstrated in all brain regions for all groups during arterial ligation with hemorrhage-induced hypotension. Blood flow rates were increased compared with preischemic values in all regions at 7 mins of reperfusion. For example, mean forebrain blood flow rates increased from 36 +/- 3 to 95 +/- 14 (SEM) mL/min/100 g of tissue in the group receiving saline, from 36 +/- 3 to 102 +/- 9 mL/min/100 g of tissue in the group receiving famotidine, and from 31 +/- 4 to 119 +/- 26 mL/min/100 g in the group receiving cimetidine. Overall, the three groups did not differ in regard to blood flow rates and cerebral VO2 values during ischemia and at 30 mins of reperfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that famotidine or cimetidine as compared with saline did not affect the pattern or extent of hyperemia after ischemia. This finding does not support the hypothesis that a H2-receptor mechanism is necessary for postischemic hyperemia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app