CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The predictive value of umbilical artery Doppler studies for preeclampsia or fetal growth retardation in a preeclampsia prevention trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical utility of longitudinal Doppler umbilical artery systolic-diastolic ratios (S/D) to predict the occurrence of either preeclampsia or fetal growth retardation (FGR) in a low-risk population.

METHODS: Healthy nulliparas with singleton gestations were enrolled in a double-blind trial of low-dose (60 mg) aspirin for preeclampsia prevention. Treatment was initiated at 24 weeks and continued until delivery. Continuous-wave Doppler studies were scheduled before assignment to treatment and at 27-31, 32-36, and 37-42 weeks. Preeclampsia was defined as a persistent diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg with proteinuria, and FGR was defined as birth weight below the tenth percentile. Doppler values were considered abnormal if they exceeded the 90th percentile for the gestational age range in the study population. Summary predictive values were computed for the abnormal S/D at each gestational age interval. To assess the potential effect of the administration of low-dose aspirin, logistic regression was used to model the relation between the Doppler indices, aspirin use, and these abnormal pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS: A total of 1665 Doppler examinations were performed on 565 women. Forty-four fetuses developed FGR and 21 women were diagnosed with preeclampsia. The positive predictive values of an abnormal S/D for the subsequent development of FGR were 13-17% across the gestational age ranges studied, and the positive predictive values for preeclampsia were 0-5%. Aspirin treatment did not affect the relation between the Doppler indices and these outcomes in the logistic regression model.

CONCLUSION: Elevated umbilical artery S/D is not a clinically useful predictor of either FGR or preeclampsia in a low-risk population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app