We have located links that may give you full text access.
Improving the continuity of care between general practitioners and public hospitals.
Medical Journal of Australia 1994 December 6
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of clinical care through better continuity of services between the public hospital and general practitioners (GPs), focusing on expediting discharge of patients from hospital through improved use of resources provided by GPs.
DESIGN: Stage 1: Participant observation during ward rounds and unstructured interviews to gain an understanding of the perceptions of hospital staff and GPs of the GP's role in the discharge process. Stage 2: Semi-structured interviews with registrars and GPs of 30 patients (who were admitted to a medical ward and discharged to the care of their GP) to get the participants' views of each other's roles in providing continuity of care.
RESULTS: There was a general lack of trust on both sides, and poor communication owing to several structural and perceptual problems. Registrars focused on specialist care and outpatient follow-up, being almost oblivious to GP functions, apart from monitoring the management plan developed in the hospital; they made no use of GPs' knowledge of the case or their experience in treating patients within their families and social milieu, and frequently wished to do everything within the hospital. GPs, on the other hand, often felt alienated from the hospital system, although they had much to offer by being able to contribute details of the patient's background and by using their special skills, which went well beyond passively monitoring progress.
RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Information about the patient's GP should be made available to hospital staff. 2. Interns should make telephone calls to GPs after admission and when the discharge date is known. 3. Early-discharge summaries should be forwarded and include: (i) reasons for giving or altering medications; (ii) specific plans after discharge; (iii) information conveyed to the patient and family about the illness; and (iv) a summary of the case by the consultant. 4. Registrars and interns should be educated about the appropriate involvement of GPs in the discharge process and throughout the patient's stay in hospital. 5. Direct involvement of the GP with the patient during hospital stay should be encouraged. 6. A pilot study should be set up to investigate the role of a liaison person in overcoming problems of the transition of care of hospitalised patients to the community.
DESIGN: Stage 1: Participant observation during ward rounds and unstructured interviews to gain an understanding of the perceptions of hospital staff and GPs of the GP's role in the discharge process. Stage 2: Semi-structured interviews with registrars and GPs of 30 patients (who were admitted to a medical ward and discharged to the care of their GP) to get the participants' views of each other's roles in providing continuity of care.
RESULTS: There was a general lack of trust on both sides, and poor communication owing to several structural and perceptual problems. Registrars focused on specialist care and outpatient follow-up, being almost oblivious to GP functions, apart from monitoring the management plan developed in the hospital; they made no use of GPs' knowledge of the case or their experience in treating patients within their families and social milieu, and frequently wished to do everything within the hospital. GPs, on the other hand, often felt alienated from the hospital system, although they had much to offer by being able to contribute details of the patient's background and by using their special skills, which went well beyond passively monitoring progress.
RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Information about the patient's GP should be made available to hospital staff. 2. Interns should make telephone calls to GPs after admission and when the discharge date is known. 3. Early-discharge summaries should be forwarded and include: (i) reasons for giving or altering medications; (ii) specific plans after discharge; (iii) information conveyed to the patient and family about the illness; and (iv) a summary of the case by the consultant. 4. Registrars and interns should be educated about the appropriate involvement of GPs in the discharge process and throughout the patient's stay in hospital. 5. Direct involvement of the GP with the patient during hospital stay should be encouraged. 6. A pilot study should be set up to investigate the role of a liaison person in overcoming problems of the transition of care of hospitalised patients to the community.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app