Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The arthroscopic Mumford procedure: an analysis of results.

Arthroscopy 1995 April
A total of 50 arthroscopic distal clavicle resections were performed for acromioclavicular joint pathology at our institution between 1990 and 1993. Follow-up on 50 shoulders (100%) was obtained at an average postoperative time of 2 years. Data were collected via physical examination, radiograph review, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and questionnaire. Average patient age was 42 years. Preoperatively all patients showed acromioclavicular joint tenderness, whereas 80% had a positive adduction test. The diagnosis of acromioclavicular degeneration was made by a combination of physical examination and radiographs (100%), acromioclavicular joint injection (4%), bone scan (44%), and magnetic resonance imaging (30%). Intraoperatively, a Claviculizer (Smith-Nephew Dyonics, Andover, MA) burr was used through standard portals in a subacromial approach to the acromioclavicular joint. There were no intraoperative complications. Forty-one patients (82%) had their general anesthetic augmented with an intrascalene block, and all procedures were done on an outpatient basis. The average distal clavicle resection was 14.8 mm. Calcifications within the resected clavicle zone were noted in the shoulders of four of the patients (16%) who returned for radiographic follow-up. The UCLA shoulder score ranked 47 shoulders (94%) good to excellent and 3 fair (6%). Subjective patient satisfaction recorded 47 (94%) good to excellent results, with an average pain relief grade of 87%. Forty-five patients (98%) would recommend the procedure. The arthroscopic Mumford procedure effectively treats acromioclavicular joint pathology. The amount of bone removed can be precisely determined with the Claviculizer burr and reliably reproduced. The procedure has low associated morbidity and high patient satisfaction regarding functional outcome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app