We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: gamma nail versus dynamic hip screw. A randomized, prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the gamma nail (GN) to the dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective clinical trial with a mean follow-up of 52 weeks (range from 11 to 82 weeks).
SETTING: A university teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred and one patients with 102 fractures: 49 fractures were treated with the DHS and 53 fractures were treated with the GN.
INTERVENTIONS: Fracture fixation with the DHS or the GN.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of duration of operation, blood loss, early and late complications, functional outcome and duration of hospital stay.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss, days in hospital, time to union and eventual functional outcome. The length of the procedure and fluoroscopy time were longer for the GN group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the GN and the DHS can be used effectively for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. In this study the DHS was associated with a lower risk of local complications and should still be considered to be the implant of choice for patients with intertrochanteric fractures.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective clinical trial with a mean follow-up of 52 weeks (range from 11 to 82 weeks).
SETTING: A university teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred and one patients with 102 fractures: 49 fractures were treated with the DHS and 53 fractures were treated with the GN.
INTERVENTIONS: Fracture fixation with the DHS or the GN.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of duration of operation, blood loss, early and late complications, functional outcome and duration of hospital stay.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss, days in hospital, time to union and eventual functional outcome. The length of the procedure and fluoroscopy time were longer for the GN group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the GN and the DHS can be used effectively for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. In this study the DHS was associated with a lower risk of local complications and should still be considered to be the implant of choice for patients with intertrochanteric fractures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app