We have located links that may give you full text access.
Screening Cutoff Values for the Detection of Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma by LC-MS/MS and a Novel Noncompetitive CLEIA.
Journal of the Endocrine Society 2024 April 7
CONTEXT: Detecting patients with surgically curable aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) among hypertensive individuals is clinically pivotal. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the ideal method of measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) because of the inaccuracy of conventional chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). However, LC-MS/MS is expensive and requires expertise. We have developed a novel noncompetitive CLEIA (NC-CLEIA) for measuring PAC in 30 minutes.
OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to validate NC-CLEIA PAC measurements by comparing them with LC-MS/MS measurements and determining screening cutoffs for both measurements detecting APA.
METHODS: We retrospectively measured PAC using LC-MS/MS and NC-CLEIA in 133 patients with APA, 100 with bilateral hyperaldosteronism, and 111 with essential hypertension to explore the accuracy of NC-CLEIA PAC measurements by comparing with LC-MS/MS measurements and determined the cutoffs for detecting APA.
RESULTS: Passing-Bablok analysis revealed that the values by NC-CLEIA (the regression slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient were 0.962, -0.043, and 0.994, respectively) were significantly correlated and equivalent to those by LC-MS/MS. Bland-Altman plot analysis of NC-CLEIA and LC-MS/MS also demonstrated smaller systemic errors (a bias of -0.348 ng/dL with limits of agreement of -4.390 and 3.694 within a 95% CI) in NC-CLEIA than LC-MS/MS. The receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that cutoff values for aldosterone/renin activity ratio obtained by LC-MS/MS and NC-CLEIA were 31.2 and 31.5 (ng/dL per ng/mL/hour), with a sensitivity of 91.0% and 90.2% and specificity of 75.4% and 76.8%, respectively, to differentiate APA from non-APA.
CONCLUSION: This newly developed NC-CLEIA for measuring PAC could serve as a clinically reliable alternative to LC-MS/MS.
OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to validate NC-CLEIA PAC measurements by comparing them with LC-MS/MS measurements and determining screening cutoffs for both measurements detecting APA.
METHODS: We retrospectively measured PAC using LC-MS/MS and NC-CLEIA in 133 patients with APA, 100 with bilateral hyperaldosteronism, and 111 with essential hypertension to explore the accuracy of NC-CLEIA PAC measurements by comparing with LC-MS/MS measurements and determined the cutoffs for detecting APA.
RESULTS: Passing-Bablok analysis revealed that the values by NC-CLEIA (the regression slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient were 0.962, -0.043, and 0.994, respectively) were significantly correlated and equivalent to those by LC-MS/MS. Bland-Altman plot analysis of NC-CLEIA and LC-MS/MS also demonstrated smaller systemic errors (a bias of -0.348 ng/dL with limits of agreement of -4.390 and 3.694 within a 95% CI) in NC-CLEIA than LC-MS/MS. The receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that cutoff values for aldosterone/renin activity ratio obtained by LC-MS/MS and NC-CLEIA were 31.2 and 31.5 (ng/dL per ng/mL/hour), with a sensitivity of 91.0% and 90.2% and specificity of 75.4% and 76.8%, respectively, to differentiate APA from non-APA.
CONCLUSION: This newly developed NC-CLEIA for measuring PAC could serve as a clinically reliable alternative to LC-MS/MS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app