We have located links that may give you full text access.
A graduate medical education (GME) quality improvement curriculum leads to improved knowledge and participation in high quality improvement projects by trainees.
International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024 April 3
BACKGROUND: There is increased awareness about the need for quality improvement (QI) education for trainees within clinical training programs. However, formal integration of a QI curriculum into graduate medical education (GME) remains a work-in-progress. We describe the creation and implementation of a novel, virtual QI curriculum complemented by virtual-based workshops.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a GME QI curriculum on 1) trainee QI knowledge; 2) Quality of QI projects.
METHODS: The GME Quality Improvement curriculum was transitioned to an optional formal curriculum in 2020. It is led by three faculty with expertise in QI training and education. The team developed four, web-based learning modules that focused on fundamental QI concepts. These modules are completed monthly and are paired with virtual workshops that facilitate applying learned QI concepts to project development. We evaluated the effectiveness of the curriculum by assessing participants' performance on knowledge-based quizzes before and after each online module. We used IBM SPSS (version 28), to conduct a two-sided paired samples t-test, comparing each post-session test scores with their corresponding pre-session scores. The alpha, or statistical threshold significance threshold, was 0.05. Additionally, two independent judges with expertise in QI evaluated the quality of the projects presented at the annual QI showcase using a standardized scoring rubric. The poster evaluation forms included 8 questions, rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Projects were graded into 4 quartiles (poor, fair, good, excellent).
RESULTS: In the knowledge assessment quiz, the difference between the mean pre- and post-session quiz scores was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The average score of the quality of the projects presented at the annual showcase was 31, in the fourth quartile which was graded as "excellent" quality.
CONCLUSION: A GME-led QI curriculum was effective in improving knowledge of QI concepts and producing high-quality scholarly projects.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a GME QI curriculum on 1) trainee QI knowledge; 2) Quality of QI projects.
METHODS: The GME Quality Improvement curriculum was transitioned to an optional formal curriculum in 2020. It is led by three faculty with expertise in QI training and education. The team developed four, web-based learning modules that focused on fundamental QI concepts. These modules are completed monthly and are paired with virtual workshops that facilitate applying learned QI concepts to project development. We evaluated the effectiveness of the curriculum by assessing participants' performance on knowledge-based quizzes before and after each online module. We used IBM SPSS (version 28), to conduct a two-sided paired samples t-test, comparing each post-session test scores with their corresponding pre-session scores. The alpha, or statistical threshold significance threshold, was 0.05. Additionally, two independent judges with expertise in QI evaluated the quality of the projects presented at the annual QI showcase using a standardized scoring rubric. The poster evaluation forms included 8 questions, rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Projects were graded into 4 quartiles (poor, fair, good, excellent).
RESULTS: In the knowledge assessment quiz, the difference between the mean pre- and post-session quiz scores was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The average score of the quality of the projects presented at the annual showcase was 31, in the fourth quartile which was graded as "excellent" quality.
CONCLUSION: A GME-led QI curriculum was effective in improving knowledge of QI concepts and producing high-quality scholarly projects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app